Political institutions and chronic food insecurity in developing countries: an empirical analysis

Thumbnail Image
Date
2001-01-01
Authors
El Obeid, Amani
Major Professor
Advisor
Stanley R. Johnson
Dermot J. Hayes
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Economics

The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 to teach economic theory as a truth of industrial life, and was very much concerned with applying economics to business and industry, particularly agriculture. Between 1910 and 1967 it showed the growing influence of other social studies, such as sociology, history, and political science. Today it encompasses the majors of Agricultural Business (preparing for agricultural finance and management), Business Economics, and Economics (for advanced studies in business or economics or for careers in financing, management, insurance, etc).

History
The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 under the Division of Industrial Science (later College of Liberal Arts and Sciences); it became co-directed by the Division of Agriculture in 1919. In 1910 it became the Department of Economics and Political Science. In 1913 it became the Department of Applied Economics and Social Science; in 1924 it became the Department of Economics, History, and Sociology; in 1931 it became the Department of Economics and Sociology. In 1967 it became the Department of Economics, and in 2007 it became co-directed by the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Liberal Arts and Sciences, and Business.

Dates of Existence
1898–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Economic Science (1898–1910)
  • Department of Economics and Political Science (1910-1913)
  • Department of Applied Economics and Social Science (1913–1924)
  • Department of Economics, History and Sociology (1924–1931)
  • Department of Economics and Sociology (1931–1967)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Economics
Abstract

World food production is growing at a faster rate than population growth and capita food energy has increased in developing countries. However, approximately 800 million people in the developing world still do not have access to sufficient food for an adequate diet. An additional quarter of a billion people periodically face food inaccessibility due to weather, instability in prices and employment, drought, diseases and civil strife, Furthermore, the distribution of food is uneven around the world.;There have been a number of theses advanced on why millions of people around the world go hungry including poverty, rapid population and urban growth, uneven distribution of food, inadequate domestic agricultural production, trade barriers and inappropriate macroeconomic policies leading to negative or slow economic growth. However, an important factor that has not been investigated is the relationship between food insecurity and the political institutions in developing countries.;The objective of this study is to better understand the sources of food security problems in developing countries and to explore empirically the strength of selected factors in explaining the underlying reasons for food security problems. The study provides an empirical analysis of the causes of chronic food insecurity including the much ignored political, civil and economic freedoms. A cross-sectional econometric model is used with data from 153 developed and developing countries for the period 1995.;The empirical analysis assesses the relative importance of the factors hypothesized to explain the differences among countries for a widely used indicator of food insecurity. The indicator of food insecurity, per capita dietary energy supply, is regressed on selected economic variables including measures of political rights and civil liberties, and economic freedom. The results show that political rights and civil liberties impact food security in developing countries indirectly through income. Countries that enjoy political and civil freedoms tend to enjoy higher incomes and in turn, are more food-secure than countries where these freedoms are repressed. These results suggest that the institutions of developing countries, which underlie these rights or freedoms, are critical in the design of interventions to alleviate poverty and therefore, food insecurity.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Subject Categories
Keywords
Copyright
Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2001